When it
comes to speakers that I admire, Winston Churchill immediately comes to mind.
As a speaker and orator he used the three of Aristotle’s Appeals; ethos,
pathos, and logos with great skill and effectiveness. What made him a great
speaker was that his power to persuade didn’t come from just one of the Appeals,
but rather the use of all three.
Aristotle’s
classification scheme works for Churchill, but isn’t fully encompassing. In
some speeches he would keep his rhetoric to only two of the three Appeals.
Churchill’s speeches almost invariably followed the five Cannon’s of Rhetoric.
Even when speaking informally with little to no preparation he was able to come
up with great and meaningful speeches that fit with his audience as well as
being relevant to current events as the situation warranted.
It is interesting how passion in an argument can enhance the message. What makes it more significant is that a moral and immoral speaker can use this method in their speech. I think it is dangerous if an immoral speaker uses this method to fulfill his own selfish ambitions. But in general these three modes of proof; ethos, pathos, and logos are great source of tools to use in public speaking. I think it gives the speaker a certain confidence when all three modes are being utilized. I also think speakers who use pathos more often than the other two modes, are able to reach more recipients and are able to make a point stronger.
ReplyDelete